LOG IN TO THOROUGHBRED TIMES

 
Need to reset your password?
 


Don't miss the deadline!

Sign up now for the Freshman Sire Contest presented by Markel and Thoroughbred Times

Chance to win cash prizes for picking leading freshman sires in 2012

To sign up and enter your Stallion Barn, click here.

  • Hard Spun sire of Ribbon Taffy 1st Mdn (May 23, 5th IND). Owner, Pucek, John Paul and Marcinek, Paige; Breeder, Matthew R. Herbener...
  • Luftikus sire of Joyful Kiss 1st Alw (May 23, 7th CT). Owner, Winfred L. Hess, Jr.; Breeder, Ann M. Casey...
  • Wando sire of Deb's Girly Girl 1st Alw (May 24, 6th RD). Owner, Deborah F. Metz; Breeder, Deborah F. Metz...
  • Canadian Frontier sire of Golden Frontier 1st Alw (May 24, 3rd CD). Owner, George Fister; Breeder, Brereton C. Jones...
  • Hard Spun sire of Gleaning 1st Mdn (May 23, 4th PID). Owner, Robert T. Manfuso; Breeder, Nursery Place & Robert T. Manfuso...
  • Include sire of Window Boy 1st Grover (Buddy) Delp Memorial S. (May 23, 8th DEL). Owner, Luis Arenas; Breeder, Shelby Lane Farm Inc. & IncludeSyndicate...
  • City Weekend sire of City Sweets 1st Mdn (May 23, 3rd IND). Owner, Mast Thoroughbreds LLC; Breeder, Robert Gorham & Mast Thoroughbreds LLC...
  • Strut the Stage sire of Head Honcho 1st Alw (May 23, 7th WO). Owner, Annecchini and D'Alimonte Holdings Inc. and Kingfield Farm; Breeder, William D. Graham...
  • Jazil sire of Love Me Good 1st Mdn (May 23, 2nd PID). Owner, Sheltowee Farm and Blazing Meadow Farm; Breeder, Sheltowee Farm...
  • Proud Citizen sire of Citizen Kat 1st Alw (May 23, 7th PEN). Owner, Midwest Thoroughbreds, Inc.; Breeder, Mark Reid & Charles Zacney...
  • Indian Charlie sire of Nechez Dawn 1st Alw (May 23, 7th AP). Owner, Tresner, Coby and Matsas, Alex; Breeder, B. P. Walden Jr., Hargus Sexton & SandraSexton...
  • Yankee Gentleman sire of Little Dale 1st Alw (May 23, 7th BEL). Owner, Vaccarezza, Priscilla, Amante, Anthony and Garrity, Christine; Breeder, Philip Birsh...
  • Bustin Stones sire of Bustinattheseams 1st Mdn (May 23, 2nd BEL). Owner, Bourque Goldstein Thoroughbreds LLC; Breeder, Eaton & Thorne, Inc....
  • Petionville sire of Wups 1st Thoroughbred Maiden Derby (May 23, 9th BOI). Owner, Paul Treasure; Breeder, Michael Iavarone...
  • Chapel Royal sire of Mr Rodriguez 1st Mdn (May 24, 2nd BEL). Owner, Imperio, Michael and Loftus, Elizabeth; Breeder, Jill Imperio & Daniella Corian...
  • Flower Alley sire of Bouquet Booth 1st Alw (May 24, 7th CD). Owner, Right Time Racing LLC; Breeder, Brookdale & Dr. Ted Folkerth...
  • Mancini sire of Ride Around Sally 1st Alw (May 23, 6th IND). Owner, Joe Uliano; Breeder, Spade Stable...
  • Latent Heat sire of Heated Troubles 1st Mdn (May 24, 5th RD). Owner, Ashleigh Stud; Breeder, Ashleigh Stud, Frank Ramos & JackieRamos...
  • Posse sire of Parody 1st Alw (May 23, 4th PEN). Owner, Midwest Thoroughbreds, Inc.; Breeder, Don Mattox & Pam Mattox...
  • Philanthropist sire of Rob the Cradle 1st Alw (May 23, 2nd WO). Owner, Andrews, Denny and Paradox Farms Inc.; Breeder, Gardiner Farms Limited...
  • Medaglia d'Oro sire of Dealer 1st Alw (May 23, 8th CT). Owner, Coleswood Farm, Inc.; Breeder, Family Broodmare, LLC...

NEWS

E-Mail this articlePrint this article

Industry News bullet



Most Popular Stories bullet

Most E-mailed Stories bullet

Humane Society favors limitations on race-day Salix

Posted: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 5:35 PM

by Frank Angst

As horse welfare has become a key point in the debate of allowing race-day Salix in the U.S., THOROUGHBRED TIMES thought it would be useful to reach out to an organization that focuses on animal welfare, the Humane Society of the United States.

Opponents and proponents of race-day medication have said they are looking out for the health and welfare of the horse. Horsemen have argued that because Salix (furosemide, often called Lasix) effectively treats exercise-induced pulmonary hemorrhage (EIPH), denying Thoroughbreds the diuretic would not be in the best health and welfare interests of the horse. They believe EIPH instances and severity of those instances would increase.

Meanwhile, groups such as the Jockey Club have called for ending its race-day Salix, linking race-day medication to breakdown problems and integrity issues, noting that such drugs put horse and rider in danger. Salix opponents also argue that horse racing is losing stature with the general public, which opposes race-day medication.

While some more radicalized animal issue groups oppose the existence of racing, the Humane Society is not opposed to the sport. It believes that vigilance is needed on horse welfare issues surrounding the sport but that ultimately horse racing can be conducted without unnecessary risk to Thoroughbreds and riders.

Keith Dane, director of the equine protection division of the Humane Society, took some time Wednesday to discuss the group’s position on race-day Salix.

THOROUGHBRED TIMES: What is the Humane Society’s position on race-day Salix?

Dane: We do not oppose it for horses that are prone to bleeding, but most horses are not prone to bleeding. Even though most horses aren’t prone to bleeding, the reason why nearly all of them race on it, as we understand it, is because it’s a diuretic and it helps the horses shed water weight and makes them lighter. The presumption is they then run faster.

If that’s the reason for the more widespread use of the drug, then it’s not really for therapeutic purposes and it is a performance enhancer. Then we’re opposed to it.

I think some research needs to be done as to how much the horses really need it. For instance, ‘Are only horses that have been scoped and truly need it being given Salix?’ We know that’s not the case.

I think what racing has to look at is the overall benefit to all horses--the breed. Is the overall future of the breed--that owners and breeders are raising concerns about--helped by allowing this drug? [Racing leaders] have to determine how many horses need this drug to prevent bleeding and how many of them are using it because it’s performance-enhancing.

Unless and until it can be shown there are a significant or overwhelming number of horses that are going to be suffering without the administration of the drug and are not being administered it for performance-enhancing reasons, we would consider it in the class of performance-enhancing drugs that we oppose the race-day use of.

TT: With many other countries conducting racing without race-day medication, does that suggest that there are other ways of controlling EIPH?

Dane: Yes. I think it would be interesting to look at when the use of it became prevalent here and why the [EIPH] problem started to crop up because it’s not cropping up in other places. Is it genetic? Is it the surfaces here, the distance of the races? What caused it to be needed for therapeutic purposes in the first place?


TT: What is the Humane Society’s view of racing in general?

 Dane (in a statement): The HSUS does not oppose all horse racing or all horse shows; however, we do oppose a variety of practices that cause unnecessary suffering or undue risks to horses. These include the use of drugs for nontherapeutic purposes to enable injured or disadvantaged animals to race, the racing of young animals whose bones and bodies have not matured sufficiently, the use of goads and whips, the soring of show horses, over-breeding, and other activities that cause unnecessary distress to horses.

 Frank Angst is senior writer of Thoroughbred Times

E-Mail this articlePrint this article

Post Comment

READER COMMENTS

Posted by: Jeanne, Ft Lauderdale, FL on August 19, 2011 at 03:12 PM

Tami my dear, I see I have hit a nerve! It is easy to pontificate from the sidelines and possibly done nothing to help a horse. I have run into this type of thinking for years. I trained race horses for thirty years. In that time I bet I rescued countless horses and I did it before I paid the light bill or my rent. Also, just shutting down racing will kill probubly more horses than would be saved. First of all; who will feed them in this harsh economic environment.....not many I'm afraid!So we all know where these horse would end up.
What needs to be done is systematically work to fix the underpinnings of the sport...Unfortunately, I don't see this happening without a major injection of tax incentives on a federal level. We need these incentives that were lost under Ronald Reagan. With that maybe we can turn this industry around and do a much better job of scrutinizing who we want as active players in the game.
On a personal note...Tami if you met me you would realize I am just as passionate about the welfare of the horse as you. And like you feel there is need for drastic change in racing in order to protect God's Magnificent Creature...the Horse. Where we difer is in our approach. Believe it or not there are people in this sport that have a standard of excellence. Many of them are my friends. Unfortuntely, there are elements/individuals in the coporate structure of racing that just doesn't give a damn about the animal and have put pressure on upstanding horseman to knuckle under and be mediocre. Like any business in this world there is greed and like you I want them gone! But shutting down the entire industry and killing thousands of horse in the process in not the way to go. Also, calling names and casting dispersion on caring dedicated racing professionals isn't a fix either. If you really want to help Tami, find the nearest adoption program at the local racetrack and roll up your sleeves. They can use someone like you with all that passion and love for the horse.....

Report Abuse

Posted by: Lisa, OKC, OK on August 12, 2011 at 10:19 AM

And as "he understands it" it is a diuretic which causes the horse to shed water weight....GOOD LORD! There isn't one trainer in the universe that wants a horse to lose more weight than he naturally does during a race!! Who is this guy kidding with such a ludicrous statement? He needs to "understand" a whole heck of a lot more.

Report Abuse

Posted by: Jeanne, Ft Lauderdale, FL on August 11, 2011 at 06:08 PM

I also would like to post a historical footnote to this discussion. My best friend (a racetrack vet) was running the horse rescue after Hurricane Andrew. It was a real mess. She had countless horses to feed and medicate. In the immediate aftermath of the storm she had no feed, medication, or other necessities. Through the support of the trainers from racetracks, farms, feed companies, even van companies; she was able to meet her goals. HOWEVER!!! The Humane Society at that time advertised the need for funds to support these same horses and received to my knowledge a seven figure sum of money from the general public at large. My friend informed me that the Humane Society didn't donate any of those funds to the care and need of these traumatized horses. Quoting from my friend, "NOT ONE CARROT WAS RECEIVED FROM THE HUMANE SOCIETY". So I think that this Director from the Humane Society should stick to managing his own shop before he starts casting dispersions on people that dedicate themselves to a seven day work-week at minimum wage....all for the love of a horse.

Report Abuse

Posted by: Denise, Richmond, VA on August 11, 2011 at 03:38 PM

For the naysayers, read the Rick Violette interview. Lasix is a preventive. Very Simple and therefore beyond the reason of the Humane Society. Do some research on the Humane Society. It is anti-everything.

Report Abuse

Posted by: Sue, Elkton, MD on August 11, 2011 at 03:04 PM

Dane is wrong about the fact that most horse do not bleed. Sadly, throughout the years there are more and more horses who do bleed, whether it be through genetics, the world we live in (how many more people get allergies these days than before)!, and without lasix they would literally bleed out through the nose - and then what an uproar that would cause. Horses pulled up from races with blood everywhere. Why would we take a medication away from a horse that does not enhance it's performance but merely makes them comfortable enough to perform to the best of their ability.

Report Abuse

View more comments

View more comments